By now you know the drill: a company releases a new tablet or smartphone that has the fastest processor, sharpest screen resolution
and sleekest design of anyone else on the market.
Until two months later, that is, when another company releases a similar tablet whose specs are just slightly better than
those of the previous champion. This is especially true in the Android tablet market where device manufacturers have been working overtime to pump out the latest-and-greatest hardware to briefly
capture the attention of the tech media and thus garner strong sales numbers before the next top-notch Android tablet hits
the shelves, whether it's the newest generation of the Samsung Galaxy Tab, the Amazon Kindle Fire or the LG Optimus.
GOOGLE REED-ER: Google posts first "Google Glasses" video
FLASHBACK: Google planning a Nexus-style tablet
With this in mind, you might wonder how Google could possibly hope to succeed with its own homespun tablet that is being rumored to drop this summer. After all, Google has had relatively little success in making its own Nexus brand of Android smartphones stand out from the crowd; what makes the company think it will fare any better in the similarly crowded tablet market?
A lot of the so-called Google Nexus tablet's future success or failure could depend on whether it provides users with a unique
experience that makes them feel that they're using a tablet that's unique to the Google brand instead of another Google-branded
device that simply piles on more high-quality hardware but is otherwise similar to its competitors. Or put another way, the
device has to feel like a Google tablet rather than just a tablet that happens to be put out by Google.
"What's missing right now is brand promise," says ABI Research analyst Jeff Orr, referring to Google's troubles in differentiating
its Nexus smartphones from other Android devices. "There's not an expectation of quality, style or innovation out of it. Google's
main efforts have been in search, advertising and software applications, and hardware doesn't really fit into that."
Scott Webster, the editor in chief at the Android Guys website, similarly says that hardware isn't Google's strong suit and says the company will have to add its own unique capabilities
in order to stand out.
"More importantly than anything, the tablet needs to be sold on experience and capabilities and not the hardware," he says.
"All hardware makers and carriers need to rely less on the specs and more on 'what it does.' Look at Apple and you see how it's done right."
So just what could a Google tablet do that would capture the public imagination? Gartner analyst Whit Andrews has three suggestions:
"A reliable iOS emulator running off the default home screen, a reality-augmentation whiteboard [and] a fully featured 'Minecraft'
client with mod API."
Let's take these in order: Adding an iOS emulator would certainly be a game-changer in the sense that it would give the Google
tablet access to two popular mobile operating systems. At the same time, you have to wonder whether Google would really want
to give Android users access to the operating system of its top competitor on one of its own devices.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers. Five Filters recommends: Donate to Wikileaks.
No comments:
Post a Comment